|
| 
 enlarge
| Brand: Canon
Category: Photography
List Price: $199.99
Buy Refurbished: $144.50
You Save: $55.49 (28%)
New (17) from $188.00
Avg. Customer Rating:  526 reviews
Color: Silver
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Number Of Items: 1
Batteries Included: No
Floppy Disk Drive: None
Optical Zoom: 3
Display Size: 3
Maximum Focal Length: 17.4
Minimum Focal Length: 5.8
Maximum Resolution: 7
Has Red Eye Reduction: Yes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 3.6 x 2.2 x 0.8
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
MPN: SD750
Model: SD750
UPC: 013803082210
EAN: 0013803082210
Release Date: March 27, 2007
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Great camera, easy to use. May 27, 2007
32 out of 34 found this review helpful
This is my second digital camera. Going from a 3.3 pixel Panasonic to this amazing machine was well worth it. I waited for the latest Canons to arrive and did a ton of research on different models before my trip. You can't go wrong with this little guy. It's compact, big 3" screen, great Video capture, lot's of great presets, and a pretty easy to figure out features. I have only two complaints about this camera. No image stabilization, No icon to show you how low your battery is. If you buy this camera, make sure you get an extra battery, and at least a 4GB memory card, I highly recommend the Extreme Sandisk brand. If you want quick and reliable photos don't go cheap on memory cards. Overall I think this is a real great value and a great camera.
 It is by far the WORST Canon model in terms of blurriness! July 12, 2007
29 out of 32 found this review helpful
I owned 3 Canon digital cameras before purchasing the SD750. I bought this one originally because I needed another Canon to replace my old Canon (5.0 megapixels). I took the SD750 on my 2 wks vacation and 80% of the photos I took came out blurry once you view them up close and download them onto the computer. Even though I love the slim modern design and the HUGE 3" screen, but it does NOT have a good stabilizer. I view myself as a decent photographer since I used my other 3 (old) Canons for years and the photos ALWAYS come out very clear and sharp. That's the MAIN reason why I stuck with Canon for so long. (I hate Sony digital camera anyway but that's another story.) But the SD750 was such a disappointment!! Maybe the one I got was defective but BestBuy (where I purchase the camera from) tested it out and said it was fine. So I ended up returning the SD750 and bought the SD850 (8.0 megapixels). Even though it's $100 more than the SD750, but the SD850 comes with the image stabilizer. I figure more money equals higher quality and I was right. The SD850 is flawless!!! I highly recommend the SD850 instead!!
 Great little camera in the SD series. Better than the SD1000 overall at the new lower price. March 11, 2008
28 out of 29 found this review helpful
Having used the SD1000 and the SD750 together for the same shots I can say that the SD750 offers more especially as there was no price difference on the day I purchased the SD750 (both were around 167 bucks). Earlier with the more than 50 bucks price difference I had recommended the SD1000 for price/value. At the new lower price the SD750 is the winner.
Neither model has the new Image Stabilization, which does not work so well on the SD series anyway when compared to other Canon cameras like S5. The SD750 has a 3" screen which makes shots easy to compose and view, while the SD1000 has a viewfinder with a 2.5" screen. Having used both cameras I'd take the larger screen size over the viewfinder any day as I hardly use the viewfinder. In size the SD1000 is a little more compact but the difference is barely noticeable. The SD750 has nicely rounded corners which are more aesthetically appealing to most people.
The SD750 also has a few more features in the software and better controls than the SD1000. The extra replay button at the back which lets you switch from camera to replay instantly is great. The extra Scene mode button on the top makes it faster and more convenient to get to the special modes like foliage, sunny beach, snow, portrait, nightshot, aquarium, kids and pets, fireworks and underwater. I have used all these special modes and I am very pleased with the results. Canon has really optimized the performance on each. It is so much better than fiddling with the manual controls while you lose the shot. If you read the manual carefully, you will get so much more out of this camera as it lets you get very creative with panoramic landscape shots, color swapping, color accent and different color modes.
The pictures from both cameras were comparable, both take excellent shots outdoors and don't have the best low light performance.
I also own a SD870 which has a wide angle lens and Image Stabilization. The software and all other features on the 870 are the same as 750, but the 870 costs much more. Although I like the 870 too, but I think the 750 delivers a great value for its current price.
This is the one I would buy as a gift. Very compact, good performance and intuitive controls that allow you to get creative in your shots.
Beautiful picture producer April 16, 2007
25 out of 27 found this review helpful
I previously owned a SD500, and have been looking for better features such as larger screen, wider zoon, higer ISO speed, etc. And found SD750, I own it now. Wow, it is very nice design of the body, slimmer than SD500. Huge 3" LCD screen, color display on screen is near original(Not just my feel, also few other friends said so). Use the dial technology similiar to the iPod's dial to switch the shoot modes, but you may take some time to get used to it. 3x optical 35-105mm zoom is better than SD500, but I wish it can go wider to 28mm like SD800 IS. SD750 has DIGIC III processor. Can use SDHC card but I hear it may cause bottleneck, so I continue using the 2GB highspeed to hold over 600 pics in highest setting. Movie shooting is great even inside the restaurant at night time. It can also record your voice to each picture. Battary life is not as good as SD500. But it still takes about 150 pictures in a full charge. Recommend to have a backup when you go traveling. No complaint for the 3" LCD. Oh, one good feature in this camera is it has an easy button to review the pictures, press the shutter to return to shooting mode. This is way better than SD500. It's one of the best so far. Highly recommend if you are looking for a compact, easy-use camera that take quality pictures. Good luck.
Added: This is just on my own preference, I have the silver version. I like this version better than the black version, unless Canon makes the whole camera body black. Another feature I use on this camera is: I can set the folder to be created on daily base, instead of seeing the picture's property for the picture day, it groups all pictures took at the same day to one folder.
Perfect Point-n-Shoot Camera August 1, 2007
25 out of 25 found this review helpful
I see myself as a amature photo-junky, 1 or 2 steps above the casual camera user. I was debating on SD750 or Sony T-100. I finally purchased SD750 while my friend purchased the T100. Few days of playing with the SD750 and a quick look at the T100, Im happy with my decision.
First, let me say if you are not going to use all the functions on the camera, you cant' really go wrong with either one of them. Dependable and works fine in most situations.
Design, I think the T-100 looks more attractive, but after that I believe SD750 is better.
LCD Screen. both have 3inch LCD, but Canon has less glare and is more vivid. both gets fuzzy in low light situations, but lcd picture isnt what you get when u print.
Stability. T-100 has image stabilization to compensate for slower shutter speed. which helps, but i still like Canon's performance. It just takes better pictures on a constant basis. Canon seems to take better pictures in low light (indoor or dim light)
ZOOM. T100 has 5X and SD750 has 3X. to me zoom on a PNS has no meaning, because 90% of the time you arent taking a photo far away.
Battery. Both suck up battery quickly. but the T-100 seems to last longer than the SD750. I just bought another batter pack to compensate for short battery life. Sony Powershot T-100 on the down side. Takes something like 5 hours to fully Charge, while SD750 only takes me 1.5 hours.
Options. I think they have about the same amount of functions. IE portrait, macro, and what not. Although i havent read the T100 manual.
Video. Both take great video. But i think t-100 has a HD version. I like Canons because u can directly connect your camera to OP source and play it. I dont think T100 had that ability.
RECOMMENDATIONS. Buy a SDHC (SD-high capacity) Card. with Class rating of 4 or better (3 class speeds, 2 4 6, determines how fast u write and read info on the card) I take video clips and do Continious photos alot. which means i fill up memory space fast, and Need a card that can keep up with the demand. Get atleast a 4gig SDHC card. Both cameras are able to read the new SDHC cards.
Extra battery for 8 bucks on e bay for SD750 is a good idea.
Overall, canon is a better bang for your buck. Cheaper, and the performance is equal or better than the SONY. but if you wanna show off to your friends, get the SONY, but if u want all around pictures get the SD750
|
|
|
2005-2007 Zone1electronics All rights reserved.
| |
