|
Sennheiser CX300-B Earbuds (Black) | 
 enlarge
| Brand: Sennheiser
Category: CE
List Price: $49.95
Buy New: $11.93
You Save: $38.02 (76%)
New (43)
Avg. Customer Rating:  477 reviews
Color: Black
Media: Accessory
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Fragile: No
Batteries Included: No
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0
Dimensions (in): 0 x 0 x 0
Legal Disclaimer: Warranty does not cover misuse of product.
Warranty: 2 years warranty
MPN: CX300-B
Model: CX300-B
UPC: 015104120943
EAN: 0015104120943
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Features:
| • | Powerful, bass-driven stereo sound / Extremely small and lightweight | | • | Frequency Response - 18 Hz- 21 kHz / Impedance 16 ohm / Max Spl 112 dB (1 kHz, 1 Vrms) | | • | Manufacturer's 2 year warranty |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The CX 300 black are high-quality stereo ear-canal headphones with powerful, bass-driven stereo sound for listening 'on the move'. Ear adapters in three different sizes ensure a perfect fit, high wearing comfort and an excellent attenuation of ambient noise. The CX 300 are ideal for use with MP3, CD, MD, or DVD players and many other portable devices.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 472 more reviews...
 How Sennheiser make Etymotic and Shure become shiver ! February 12, 2006
139 out of 216 found this review helpful
Sennheiser CX 300 series was formerly launch into the professional musician market as Sennheiser IE4 In-Ear Monitor.
Sennheiser IE4 sold at ~150 US Dollar (Suggested Retail Price). As a competitor of Etymotic Er6 and Shure E3c.
Following the product's success in the professional market now it is time to harvest from the vast consumer market.
So the marketing description of this product now change from "the high accuracy reproducing of the sound" into the new hype "the bass driven sound".
Very common marketing trick. :-)
Sennheiser IE4 was a rebranding of the highly acclaim "Sharp MD33".
Sharp MD33 is one of the most succesfull IEM in the world.
It also described as a "giant killer".
After it got wide reputation around the world Sharp MD 33 was rebranded into Creative ep630 (which can be found in Asia) and Sennheiser IE4 (which goes directly to the most demanding professional musicians market.
Sound of this Sennheiser/ Sharp/ Creative IEM is solid and very clear.
Bass is decent, mid and high are details.
It need less maintenance comparing with Etymotic or Shure since it cleverly use metal grills instead of direct filter.
Once a month scrap your earwax out of the metal grill is enough to keep this decent IEM working for years.
Silicone ear tips are interchangeable with Sony's ex series ear tips.
If you want to do some experiment you can try Shure's ear tip on them.
Even somebody have suggested Shure's Ultra Soft Flex Sleeve (PA749M) on this IEM but I would like to suggest Shure's PA757M Flex Sleeves instead. (Please change the size according to your ear size)
With Shure PA757M Flex Sleeve this Sharp/ Creative/ Sennheiser IEM sounds as if the sound stage become expanded without deterioration in sound quality.
If you live in US this Sennheiser IEM is worth your money. And sound quality is much better than many expensive IEM.
Impressive sound May 30, 2006
108 out of 113 found this review helpful
I bought these when the left earbud on my Sony MDR-EX51LP's stopped working. I was initially upset because I (thought I) liked the Sony's and planned on just getting another pair of them. However, I saw a favorable review of these in PC Magazine and decided to give them a try. I'm really glad I did! The sound is much richer and the bass is much deeper than with the Sony's and it is giving me a better appreciation of the music. Now, I don't miss an opportunity to pull out my ipod to fill the time. These also seem to be louder which allows me to listen to the ipod on a lower volume and get a little extra battery life out of it. On the plane, they also do a better job of supressing the sound of the engines. All around, I'm very pleased. They cost twice as much as my old Sony's, but in my opinion they are well worth it.
Audio Engineering Excellence February 20, 2007
68 out of 69 found this review helpful
I recently listened to music with these for 5 hours straight and got to know them well. These babies are awesome. The highs are bright, the mid-range is excellent and the low-end/bass is very good. I'm amazed they can produce sound of this quality in such a small device. Bose and Klipsch have nothing on these things. And it bares repeating, the bass is VERY GOOD - almost THX quality. Taking further into account the price of these things and we're talking BEST BUY.
 Great sound, horrible cord June 8, 2006
43 out of 68 found this review helpful
I have loved the sound of these since I bought them over a month ago. The best sounding ear buds I have ever heard. However, the model has two exceptional drawbacks. First, they use that style of one line to one ear being longer to the others, which means that the weight of the cord, while not substantial in general, hangs on one ear. This makes this sort of model really awful for anything athletic, as the bouncing of the cord puts the weight on the plug in one ear, which is annoying to feel and also much more likely to have it come loose while you are running, etc. Basic iPod buds, or apple, seem to have always known better than to do this dumb arrangement, using the standard Y shaped cord of equal length from ear to ear. Second, and worse, the cord itself is made of a kind of kinky rubber/plastic that keeps curling up and not hanging smoothly and easily. This combined with the fact of the uneven length of cable from ear to ear makes the cord often kink up and rub on your neck. You virtually cannot make it stop doing this. I have found I love these if I'm wearing a dress shirt but hate them when wearing a t-shirt for the constant inability of the cord to lie flat and without notice.
So, in sum. Awesome sound. Great company. Excellent build. Horrible cord design and material. So bad, I can no longer stand to use them. I'm back with the basic Apple ear buds.
UPDATE: Get the Shure e2's. Wonderful sound (Just like the Senn's) but amazingly well made, including the best quality cords I've ever seen on any ear buds. They are strong, well constructed, and wear and feel good.
 A reasonable product, for the price, but don't get carried away April 22, 2007
27 out of 33 found this review helpful
I am an audio engineer. I own many sets of headphones for different applications; Shure e500, Bose QC2 (I never use these anymore, bulky and bland sounding), Sony MDR V6, Shure e4c, and a drawer full of Apple, Sony and Panasonic earbuds. My favorites are the Shure e500, which are so fine that I find myself frequently prefering my Nano 2 with Apple Lossless recording to my home stereo (a very high end rig).
That said, at $450, my beloved Shure 'phones are not exactly a good candidate for working out in the gym, or sleeping (I use an iPod to block ambient noise with rain).
I tried the Sony '51s, but they kept croaking, and the sound was abysmal. The '71s sounded better, but also died after a few months. I settled on the Sennheisers, because their low profile makes them comfortable for sleeping, and they provide a reasonable (about 10-15db) noise blocking.
The fit and finish is great, no doubt about that. I wish they had a segmented cable so you could adjust the length. I've read reviews where people complain the cord is too short, but I can only assume they have iPods on their hips, because I use a Nano 2 on an armband, and have to wrap about 2 1/2 feet of cord around the back of the iPod. It works, but... Also, keeping the cord short keeps the cable weight from yanking the buds out of the ear when you are active.
However, to be blunt, anyone who says these "sound great" does not know what good sound is. The Sennheiser CX 300 is shockingly bright. If you haven't deafened yourself playing your iPod too loud, you'll hear they are at least 6DB hot over 6kHz, if not 8-9db. That is like turning the tone control all the way up, to "11."
The only workaround is to have a higher end iPod with tone control, and to use the "reduced treble" setting. This brings the tonal balance down to something reasonable.
Frankly, at a pricepoint of over $50, there is really little excuse for a product to be this acoustically innacurate.
|
|
|
|
2005-2007 Zone1electronics All rights reserved.
| |
